Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMulwa, David M
dc.contributor.authorKiilu, Redempta M
dc.contributor.authorMusau, Catherine N
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-22T13:55:21Z
dc.date.available2018-11-22T13:55:21Z
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.identifier.citationSRJIS SEPT, 2012, Vol. – I, Issue-IIen_US
dc.identifier.issn2278-8808
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mksu.ac.ke/handle/123456780/2001
dc.description.abstractThe declarations of the 1990 Jomtien World Conference on Education and the 2000 Dakar World Education Forum both emphasized that to achieve Education for All (EFA) by 2015 , in addition to increased access to education, all countries would require to improve the quality and equity of education so that recognized and measurable learning outcomes are achieved by all. Ministries of education worldwide fully agree with this interpretation of the EFA mission, Kenya included. However, many educational planners in developing countries have raised two related questions: firstly, when resources are scarce, can greater improvements in the performance of a population of students be made by focusing these resources on a limited section of the population? Secondly, would it be better to spread these resources thinly across the whole student population? The issues leave planners in a dilemma, and suggest that there might be an inherent trade-off situation that operates in education systems between the average level of student learning outcomes and their equitable distribution.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAccessen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectEffectivenessen_US
dc.subjectEquityen_US
dc.subjectQualityen_US
dc.titleCritical analysis of the effectiveness of programmes and activities developed to improve educational access, quality and equity in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record